<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dear Spammers&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thermalblog.co.uk/dear-spammers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thermalblog.co.uk/dear-spammers/</link>
	<description>Its just a lot of hot air...</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 09:17:35 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://thermalblog.co.uk/dear-spammers/#comment-7541</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 20:24:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thermalblog.co.uk/dear-spammers/#comment-7541</guid>
		<description>I'm with you John, but as with email spam enough people DO follow it to make it worthwhile.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m with you John, but as with email spam enough people DO follow it to make it worthwhile&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://thermalblog.co.uk/dear-spammers/#comment-7539</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 14:04:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thermalblog.co.uk/dear-spammers/#comment-7539</guid>
		<description>I absolutely hate comment spam.
Just looked at my askimet stats and it's marked over 1000 as spam -v- 5 genuine real life comments.
I really don't understand the point of it - as if you're going to allow a link to some dubious site.
It's got to be computer generated or do they set up a comment template and try to distribute it as far and as wide as possible?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I absolutely hate comment spam.<br />
Just looked at my askimet stats and it&#8217;s marked over 1000 as spam -v- 5 genuine real life comments.<br />
I really don&#8217;t understand the point of it - as if you&#8217;re going to allow a link to some dubious site.<br />
It&#8217;s got to be computer generated or do they set up a comment template and try to distribute it as far and as wide as possible?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://thermalblog.co.uk/dear-spammers/#comment-7512</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2008 20:21:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thermalblog.co.uk/dear-spammers/#comment-7512</guid>
		<description>Hear hear.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hear hear.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cly</title>
		<link>http://thermalblog.co.uk/dear-spammers/#comment-7508</link>
		<dc:creator>Cly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2008 01:54:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thermalblog.co.uk/dear-spammers/#comment-7508</guid>
		<description>As for me, spam is nothing but a no substance comments. If he talks about something useful to readers why not reward the person with link and the choice of anchor text? Of course, I wouldn\'t accept links and anchor text from sites that promote hate, drugs, and etc.

Spam is inevitable. Just like the first comment poster said it\'s a sign of success. The more you have it the more famous your blog is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As for me, spam is nothing but a no substance comments. If he talks about something useful to readers why not reward the person with link and the choice of anchor text? Of course, I wouldn\&#8217;t accept links and anchor text from sites that promote hate, drugs, and etc.</p>
<p>Spam is inevitable. Just like the first comment poster said it\&#8217;s a sign of success. The more you have it the more famous your blog is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mlankton</title>
		<link>http://thermalblog.co.uk/dear-spammers/#comment-7489</link>
		<dc:creator>mlankton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 18:09:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thermalblog.co.uk/dear-spammers/#comment-7489</guid>
		<description>I get irritated when I see my articles reproduced on some splog with a bad neighborhood domain like "gayafricansex.net". 

I use a different CMS and I do not have comments, so no issues with comment spam.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I get irritated when I see my articles reproduced on some splog with a bad neighborhood domain like &#8220;gayafricansex.net&#8221;. </p>
<p>I use a different CMS and I do not have comments, so no issues with comment spam.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://thermalblog.co.uk/dear-spammers/#comment-7458</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 18:53:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thermalblog.co.uk/dear-spammers/#comment-7458</guid>
		<description>Thanks C.

Work gets in the way of blogging :-(

Yeah I know what you mean it's certainly a dubious badge of honour. I just thought I'd make it clear in case any of them whine about getting deleted......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks C.</p>
<p>Work gets in the way of blogging <img src='http://thermalblog.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':-(' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
Yeah I know what you mean it&#8217;s certainly a dubious badge of honour. I just thought I&#8217;d make it clear in case any of them whine about getting deleted&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Curmudgeon</title>
		<link>http://thermalblog.co.uk/dear-spammers/#comment-7457</link>
		<dc:creator>The Curmudgeon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 14:53:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thermalblog.co.uk/dear-spammers/#comment-7457</guid>
		<description>Good to see a resumption (spasm?) of blogging activity, Chris.

(Spasm -- that's spams spelled sideways.)

I have to tell you these spammers are pretty savvy.  I have multiple email accounts (don't say there's one for everyone of the voice in my head -- that's not nice).

Some of these accounts are more active than others.  Guess which ones draw the big-time spam?

Fortunately (?) for me my blogs are so unimportant in the Blogosphere that they seldom attract spam comments.

When you think about it, spam is almost a sign of success, isn't it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good to see a resumption (spasm?) of blogging activity, Chris.</p>
<p>(Spasm &#8212; that&#8217;s spams spelled sideways.)</p>
<p>I have to tell you these spammers are pretty savvy.  I have multiple email accounts (don&#8217;t say there&#8217;s one for everyone of the voice in my head &#8212; that&#8217;s not nice).</p>
<p>Some of these accounts are more active than others.  Guess which ones draw the big-time spam?</p>
<p>Fortunately (?) for me my blogs are so unimportant in the Blogosphere that they seldom attract spam comments.</p>
<p>When you think about it, spam is almost a sign of success, isn&#8217;t it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
